
Disclaimer
These questions and answers are for general information and
guidance only. They should not be relied on in particular situations
without contacting Quigg Golden and receiving detailed advice.
How do we deal with retention?
Every standard form of contract in the construction industry has
some form of provision for retention or reserve. As with all issues
like this, the starting point is to look at the contract and find
out what it actually says.
DOM/1 is a typical contract, the provision for dealing with retention
is at Clause 21.5 which provides:
• up until Practical Completion, the Contractor can deduct
the percentage which is stated in the Articles of Agreement. The
Articles of Agreement provide that if no percentage is inserted
it will be 5%. In many instances this rate may be negotiated to
3%. It is worthwhile providing evidence that a percentage of 5%
is not required from previous projects completed within a 6 year
period.
• although the reduction in the retention percentage may appear
minimal, it may have a disproportionate impact on a contractor's
profitability. When you consider 2% of £X thousands of pounds
retained by the employer/contractor over the period of the contract
and 12 months after Practical Completion of the works. Example contract
sum £300,000.00, retention at 5% and 3% will be £15,000.00
and £9,000.00 respectively, a difference of £6,000.00
over a possible period of 2 years. Thus, a 2% reduction would make
available to a contractor an extra £6,000.00, which should
be working for him.
• upon practical completion but before a Certificate of Completion
of Making Good Defects is issued, only one half of the percentage
of retention can be deducted. Ensure you have a calendar marked
with dates on which retention should be requested and take action
on those dates as they occur.
• upon the issue of a Certificate of Completion of Making
Good Defects, all retention monies are to be released, by way of
an interim payment, to the contractor. Again this date should be
marked on your calendar as two dates, when to request the release
and when to receive payment. Remember that if a contract or sub-contract
does not make specific provision for retention then the employer/contractor
has absolutely no right to withhold retention. If retention is provided
for, the percentage and release dates may vary accordingly. First
check if the contract allows for the taking of retention, and secondly
check the rate of percentage. Negotiate a lower rate where possible.
Lower rates add substantially to the profitability of a contractor.
In some instances a contractor/sub-contractor can wait for the
release of retention for long periods after the works have been
completed. Use effective procedures to chase these monies on a regular
basis. It may only take a few letters and threats of adjudication
or arbitration. These actions may only be minor but accumulatively
they add substantially to the profitability of a company and its
cashflow.
It is our experience that retention and percentages of retention
are accepted as standard issues in most contracts. This general
acceptance should not be the norm and should be challenged whenever
the issue arises. It is particularly unfair to groundwork sub-contractors
or structural steel sub contractors who may complete their works
long before practical completion of the main contract. If they have
to wait a very long time for release of retention on large sums,
this may have a disastrous impact on cashflow and profitability.
In such circumstances, it is definitely worthwhile negotiating for
a lower rate or zero retention where possible. In some instances
the monies involved in retention equate to the profit on the project.
It has recently be described as unfair in the in the UK by the
House of Commons Report “Construction Matters” printed
on 8 July 2008.
What practical steps can I take to get your retention released?
There are a number of steps that you can take to make sure that
your retention is released as soon as it is due to you:
• apply early;
• mark dates on a calendar as to when retention should be
released for example the time of the issue of the certificate of
completion of making good defects. Mark when to request the release
and when to receive payment;
• keep asking;
• take action!
When is the first half of the retention money released?
Most people expect the answer to be very simple as it is either
released on Practical Completion for JCT Contracts or at Substantial
Completion for ICE Contracts. This, of course, is true but it ignores
the fact that many contracts are not in those forms or that there
may be no provision for the deduction of retention monies at all.
The position is much more complicated with sub-contracts. Many
sub-contracts do not provide for retention and material suppliers
will rarely allow for retention in their standard terms and conditions.
Those sub-contracts which do provide for retention may either provide
that the first half is released at practical completion of the main
contract works, or is released when the sub-contract works are substantially
complete. There can be a long time between those two dates. When
negotiating at the tender stage, where possible express a release
of retention when the sub-contract works are substantially complete
and not on practical completion of the main contract works. These
are strategies to improve cashflow and profitability. Individually
these steps may appear small, but cumulatively over many contracts
they may have substantial impact on getting paid, cashflow and profitability.
Thus, the terms of the contract will decide what event triggers
the release. The most common event is practical completion but that
in turn introduces a level of uncertainty because practical completion
is often not clearly defined.
When is the final release of all retention monies?
The only money which the Employer is entitled to hold after Practical
Completion is the retention money. If the Certificate of Completion
of Making Good Defects has been issued under a JCT form, then the
second half of the retention must be released.
If there are defects apparent at any stage up to the issue of the
Certificate of Practical Completion, then either the employer does
not pay for that part of the work which is not done properly, or
the Certificate of Completion of Making Good Defects is not issued.
If there is a suspicion of latent defects, it would be very prudent
to have an investigation done prior to the end of the defects liability
period.
Where there are no suspicions of latent defects and withholding
retention is merely an insurance in case of latent defects, then
the Employer does not have authority to do this. If Employers wished
to amend the JCT Contract to protect against such situations, it
would be quite easy to do so. For example the retention could be
released at the end of six years. Contractors should resist such
a move vigorously, as it does not make good commercial sense and
definitely does not assist in the profitability or the company's
cashflow.
If an Employer felt that the retention was not a sufficient amount
of money, then the sum being held could be increased by amending
the contract to 10% as is very common overseas. This might have
an effect on tender prices in that tenders would be higher and have
a higher percentage for profit and overheads to reflect the greater
liability being undertaken by Contractors.
What procedures need to be followed before money can be set-off?
Different contracts have different procedures. Some such as the
NEC are very simple, others such as JCT Sub-Contracts in the UK
or RIAI Sub-Contracts in Ireland are complex. Invariably there must
be adequate notice and sufficient detail before the set-off is valid.
The importance of serving a withholding notice on time and making
it a valid notice cannot be emphasised enough. If this is not done
then the right to set-off may be lost.
Top of Page
|